About
Jochem Hendricks is a contemporary artist from Frankfurt, Germany. He is mostly known for his works that address complex, moral and ethical issues. The objects that he produces are often beautiful, yet beneath the surface of them lie elaborate backstories which at times can test the boundaries of legality. Art critics are viewers of his work will often debate whether he is classed as a criminal or an artist in disguise, as a lot of his work has required him to act illegally or break the law. He seems to want to test the boundaries of these lines between criminality and art. His work includes sculpture, photography, painting, drawing and film.
Work
 |
'Eye Drawings' 1992 |
Throughout the many years that he’s been a practising artist he has used a wide range of materials and experimented with all kinds of different media. Some things being ground breaking in the field of art. In 1992 he produced a body of work known called “Eye Drawings” which were created using infra-red computer technology using only the movement of his eyes. This work is an example of his pushing the boundaries very early on in his practice as to when it stops being art. When they were created in 1992, they were rejected by the art industry as they apparently relied too much on technology.

A lot of Hendricks’ work is very controversial and shocking, but not until you know the background of the piece. One of his most controversial pieces is ‘Left Defender Right Leg’ a synthetic diamond, which at first glance does not seem very special. But in reality, the diamond was made from a human leg. It was made from the amputated leg of a football player and Hendricks admits that the idea is supposed to make you feel uncomfortable. It was converted to carbon and then to pure graphite which was then used to create a synthetic diamond. The diamond is mounted on black velvet cushion and stuffed with tobacco because the legs loss was apparently caused by a smoking related disease.
Similar work to this is ‘Cold Birds’ which are dead birds also transformed into synthetic diamonds. This particular type of work isn’t about the skill but more conceptual.

One of Hendricks’ interests and something in which he addresses a lot in his work is economic problems, specifically tax reductions. This is mostly shown in his piece ‘Luxury Avatar’. This is a plastic replica of himself. In order to avoid paying taxes he buys luxury materials for his avatar. Because of this it almost parallels the existence of himself, his avatar is living a life of luxury while he is not. It’s an on-going piece which is common in his work. The head is only gold because he ran out of money. He states that eventually he wants to add clothes, and wants to buy a car, a house until he dies or the financial offices stop him. This is one of many examples in which he is acting illegally to create art, but he does this to send a message. His work is full of dire revelations about what criminals or artists can commit in plain view of the law. There is a chilling theatricality to everything he makes.

Keeping with the theme of economic problems, Hendricks produced a body of paintings. Instead of doing them himself, he made the paintings like an industrial product. He hired painters from all over the world to create the paintings. They were then obscured by African- made wooden frames, which criss-cross the canvas and obscure it. The idea behind this is that t becomes a project which runs all over the world, and apparently economically cheaper than producing everything himself.
‘Pack’ is an instillation piece of taxidermy fighting dogs. Over a period of years Hendricks has carefully sourced and acquired the bodies of a number of dead fighting dogs. This is a very physical piece and definitely creates a tense atmosphere. While this could be seen as a rather tame piece of work in comparison to others, the fact that the possession of some of these dogs is illegal or frowned upon in some countries further shows ways in which he is pushing the boundaries on modern art.
Influences

Hendricks doesn’t speak a lot about his influences, but a few of his pieces he admits were influenced by certain artists. His collection named ‘Concetto’ which is a collection of metal surfaces being pierced or punctured by firearms is greatly influenced by the artist Lucio Fontana. He describes his collection as Fontana for the slums.
Marcel Duchamp is probably one of his biggest influences. The goal of Hendrick’s work is to capture the audience and make them want to know the background of the work. It’s almost like the viewer finishes the art by looking and understanding it, the audience is therefore a big tool for the artist, his work would almost be incomplete without the viewer.
In relation to my work
As well as admiring his work and the ideas in which he stands for, his work has been quite a big influence on my own work. His collection ‘Collapsed Avatar’ features broken busts, he stated he did this merely out of curiosity as to what would happen. My sculptural pieces feature broken casts of hands. Similarly I also cast a replica of myself, which is in no way perfect or incomplete. It takes years for Hendricks to finish his work and so makes a lot of his stuff about the production and process. In relation to this I think we are similar as I don’t class my work as complete. I’m carrying on with this work, adding or manipulating it into something different.