Seminar Presentation Evaluation

I looked back at all the feedback sheets and have rounded up all the points that people made about my presentation. Overall a lot of people stated that the thought my presentation was informative and clear and that I had a full understanding of the artist and his work. They also thought I explored a large selection of his work was really dug deep in researching about Jochem Hendricks instead of just finding general points like when he was born and where he lives etc. My presentation brought in a debate about the morality of art and his Jochem Hendrick's illegal actions to create work. I think this was seen as positive, the presentation caught peoples attention and made them think about some of the issues surrounding the artist.

Some of the weaknesses that was said about my presentation was that it would have been good if I included examples of my own work into my presentation. While I talked about how the artist related to my work, I didn't include images in my power point. So I can understand why people put that down as a weakness, it probably would have been more beneficial to include photos of my own work so it could be easier for people to understand the link between his work and my work. Something else that Dale pointed out was that it would have good if I explained a few phrases such as "Avatar" in case people didn't understand what I was talking about.

Overall I agree and am pleased with the feedback given about my presentation. I can now take the strengths and weaknesses into consideration and this can help me further improve my presentation skills.